News

The COVID-19 pandemic has proved an interesting challenge to workers’ compensation systems around the country. Specifically, there has been a significant push for providing for coverage of healthcare workers and other front-line workers who have faced, and continue to face, a greater risk of exposure than the majority of the population. After Virginia’s first attempt at a bill to provide for a healthcare provider COVID-19 presumption was passed by indefinitely during the 2020 Special Session I, it ultimately succeeded in both chambers during the 2021 Special Session, and was signed into law by Governor Northam on March 31, 2021. This...

OCTOBER 5, 2021 1:00 p.m. – 5:00 p.m. 20TH ANNUAL WORKERS’ COMPENSATION VIRTUAL SEMINAR CEU credits applied for this presentation

The Virginia General Assembly at its 2021 Regular Session and 2021 Special Session produced several new pieces of legislation of particular interest – please click here to read this article

Click here to read this article

Over the past few years, there has been a steady rise of claims seeking payment of medical bills for treatment long since provided to injured employees. The Virginia Workers’ Compensation Commission has recently issued several opinions providing more clarity on how to defend against these claims. The Virginia Workers’ Compensation Commission approved a final settlement via Petition and Order on July 17, 2019, relating to a compensable injury by accident occurring on December 28, 2012. Flynn v. Crossmark Holdings, Inc., JCN VA00000720409 (Dec. 17, 2020). On September 5, 2019, the claimant sought payment of alleged unpaid and underpaid medical expenses...

Due to the power shift from the 2019 elections when the Democrats gained control over the General Assembly, the 2020 legislative session resulted in workers’ compensation bills that largely favored the interests of injured workers over those of employers and insurers. Although the 2020 Special Legislative Session resulted in the temporary defeat of COVID-19 presumption legislation, largely due to the expense to localities and to the Commonwealth, the 2021 Session of the Virginia General Assembly is slated to similarly favor injured workers. Based on the content of the bills introduced thus far, the proposed legislation expands the rights of injured...

In today’s aging workforce, an injured worker’s retirement will likely arise often in workers’ compensation claims. How does an injured worker’s voluntary retirement impact their workers’ compensation benefits? Is the employer still responsible for wage loss, when an injured worker retires? Under the Virginia Workers’ Compensation Act, the employer and carrier are only responsible for a claimant’s wage loss that is attributable to his or her work injury. In the case of a claimant’s retirement, the claimant’s economic loss is related to his retirement, and not his injury. His or her retirement is the cause of his loss of compensation,...

Click this link or the image below to play the message

In the age of COVID-19, many employers are turning to telecommuting as a preventative measure to protect their employees from the virus. But what happens when a telecommuting employee suffers an injury while working at home? What circumstances determine whether or not the injury incurred at home is compensable? Virginia Code § 65.2-101 requires that the claimant prove that he or she suffered an “injury by accident arising out of and in the course of the employment.” An injury occurs in the course of employment when it takes place within the period of employment, at a place where the employee...

The Court of Appeals of Virginia recently had occasion to address the “in the course of” requirement as well as the personal comfort doctrine in the case of Newman Knight Frank and Zurich American Insurance Company v. The Estate of Bruce A. Williams, Record No.: 0600-20-2 (November 4, 2020). The Court of Appeals affirmed the Commission’s award of death benefits finding that credible evidence supported the Commission’s finding that decedent was either resting before his shift or working. Furthermore, the Court of Appeals held that the Commission did not err in determining that, regardless of which was true, decedent’s injury...